often happens to us all. We are in the company of a person we know very well and, suddenly, based only on a specific gesture or a particular expression, we can predict what going to do! Recently I happen to notice more often and I enjoy.
There is what must ask you a delicate question and the first begins with a "But ..." (extending the long vowel sound) and then spit out the question that haunts the speed double than its traditional rhythm of speech, almost burned up the time with that voice hesitant.
There is what puts his arms behind his back and straighten your posture ... that moment know who is going to ask for something which needs to hire a carriage able to deploy quickly from the Right, to corner and force you to answer.
There is evidence that resulted from the advantage of a TV or newspaper that keeps under his eyes starting to make some long-postponed debate; picks effectively to leap a fleeting comment in an article on TG about some issue that involves you and takes the opportunity to cling to and start a debate for which he could not find the best intro ...
This would only be a futile exercise of mind but to reveal an even more fascinating: not only are we able, in circumstances like those over here, guess what they're doing our subject but also the content of his speech. We already know what we say, because the way you are putting to us is certainly indicative. I know when My parents are going to come up with a nice comment or a rebuke and this is not because of their mood daily but because of the attitude we take on, turning to me. I could intercept them in mid-sentence (even at the beginning, actually) and give an immediate answer, I could avoid countless rumors harnessing the knowledge of their body language acquired through years and years and avoid arguments, placing the correct answer I already know !
But you know what I find funny about all this? The fact that almost all of us, faced with such a psychological advantage ... we behave as if it had not ! How many times have we sorbitol discussions hell we already knew would take place? How many times have we still through all the steps canons in these areas, almost like the first time that such issues were dealt with ... but that was not?
Why we do it? Why not take (almost) never had the undeniable advantage of prolonged observation and the close relationship we have from the person in question? Perhaps prefer that things continue as we know ... maybe we want these discussions to take place precisely because they are usually so familiar, almost reassuring, although dictated by angry outbursts or ENTAILING / quarrel.
Perhaps the most often prefer the traditional quiet storm instead of the unknown ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment