of John Locke does not go from here ... Reassuring surfing through the channels I stumbled titles head of a fiction Italian Rai. For some unfathomable reason I decided to stay tuned and watch the beginning.
The protagonist goes to a friend divorcee with a child and seeing a scene kid. The two friends begin to talk about the problems of single mothers ... and here it is my feeling that supply the legs with a loud snap deaf!
Over a long dialogue, in essence, the two characters tell all the prerequisites to qualify for the story and then take off (so to speak) the action (you always say). I do not remember the exact wording of that exchange of words but I could present an example below, inspired by the original:
HIM: "It must be tough raising a child alone. "
HER:" Yes, you're right. Unfortunately since my husband passed away a year ago to escape with the girl met her at work things are made complicated.
HIM: "I never approved of his attitude, you know. Escape so, after twenty years of marriage was a cowardly act. "
HER:" Perhaps it is because of quell'aborto, four years ago ... "
... and so on, I may have (slightly) the extreme, but the gist was this.
Time: is it possible that in 2010 we should still watch this stuff type, I mean, I guess one of the basic rules of the script is precisely to focus not so much detail in a dialogue because it makes only descriptive , becomes a means easy and unrealistic (because Nobody talks that way! ) to introduce viewers to the story. But, I say, it was easier to show the single mother fighting with the rebel son and close the scene with her that looks out on a photo on a table that captures the ex-husband and children? It is certainly not a strategic ploy original but certainly can provide some clues to the viewer (the father apparently no longer part of the family), can pave the way to unravel the events that will happen late, and above all, allows to avoid an avalanche of tedious monologues and implausible that slowing things down and slow to bring the story to the heart.
Anyone who knows me knows how much I consider basic the script in the context of a film. Without a solid script boned even the best director falls in the ass (a striking example of the last, revolting, movies with Indiana Jones film ... not even mention the horrible title!) And the product is of bad quality . Here, it seems to me that the vast majority of homegrown fiction is precisely the scenario in hiding more. Ok, there are also some series that rely on the main roles in Cagnacci matriculated sbracano meatloaf and bad in just because the actors do not know the pseudo-half-measures and "read" only for extremes and exaggerations ( who appointed the Garko & Arcuri? I heard you, over there !) but very often are the stories to be poorly written, so flat and predictable. It appears that you do not want to take the viewer to participate with his head, to add the plot details to complete the overall picture without the main character repeats everything every 5 minutes or directed such shows anything so blatant as to break any kind of intervention "active" part of the beholder.
I wonder if we should only ever be satisfied. I do not ask "Mad Men" "Nip / Tuck" "24" "True Blood" "Pushing Daisies" ... and for heaven's sake do not ask "Lost" ... but a minimum of care? A minimum of ambition? We must always focus on SKY to see something that looks like a well made TV series? The broadcast TV just will not? I know there are exceptions (maybe he can talk) but I'm not saying that it is the most promoted and trumpeted Fiction RAI / Mediaset are not the cagatine, strength ... But I do not think that people just want this . Also I do the public, cock, and I'm happy! I want to surprise me!
look forward to be proved wrong but I would love to become an avid viewer of some Italian series are just as many overseas. I swear that I'd like!